Adding to my previous post:
* I wonder if there should be at least one "hard" slide or concept in the presentation, which only a few will get.
One common suggestion about job talks is that the presenter should include some stuff that is a little in-depth to catch attention of the people who are closely following the related line of research -- mostly, to demonstrate the hardness of the problem and the significance of the presented result. I believe similar kind of expectations can be assumed for any other presentation as well. When people say "no equations", it does not mean "absolutely no equations" -- it is rather "no equations in most of the presentation, and a couple of key equations on that `hard' part of the presentation". In other words, there should be some motivation for the audience to look at additional details after the talk. They should not leave with a feeling that they understood everything. There are definitely some negative aspects of this approach, and I have a feeling that only a few people will approve of this. But, in my opinion, this has practical implications and avoids the risk of the talk being perceived as simplistic.
Tuesday, November 11, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment